Too bad I'm not a neocon, and haven't expressed solidarity with a single one of those comments, ben! But thank you for caring enough to crawl out from under your little troll bridge and comment even though you're (rightfully) banned on my blog.

To a neocon, anyone offering a dissenting opinion is labeled a troll.


Here's another slogan that might fit a neocon's campaign:

"Protecting your God given right to beat your children."

Ben,

That last comment was not only horribly wrong, it was below the belt. If you have READ what I have written, you would understand my opposition to CPS.

May I ask why you've taken on a personal crusade to slander me and take me down, Ben? You are truly the asshole of assholes. I don't know if this violates joeuser's terms of service, but I am strongly considering forwarding it to JU's admins to decide.

But thank you for caring enough to crawl out from under your little troll bridge and comment even though you're (rightfully) banned on my blog.

Tsk, tsk, and i thought you capable of handling dissent, particularly satire. Ben is no more guilty than the Terpfan club that hammers away at the leftist as a matter of daily exercise.

Tsk, tsk, and i thought you capable of handling dissent, particularly satire. Ben is no more guilty than the Terpfan club that hammers away at the leftist as a matter of daily exercise.

I can handle dissent, steven...when it's intelligent. Ben has made it abundantly clear that his blog is particularly and intensely directed at ME. Because he concentrates solely and COMPLETELY on PERSONAL attacks (EVERY comment he has made on my blog has been directed at me; EVERY article I have seen on his blog has been directed at me), he has no place on my blog. I am FAR from a "neocon"; if he wanted to attack my Libertarian views, that would be another issue entirely, and, yes, would be fair game. And his implication that I defend the right of a parent to abuse their child is beyond the pale; I could make similar claims about the LEFT defending the right to RAPE a child, and would actually be on solid footing (ACLU defending NAMBLA; Judge Cashman in VT); but it would be equally intellectually dishonest, as those do NOT represent the views of the left (many Democrats I know have actually resigned their ACLU membership over the NAMBLA thing), especially in light of the fact that I have REPEATEDLY shown how the reforms I suggest would actually create MORE EFFECTIVE weapons to fight real cases of abuse.

Please note: while I respond to SOME of terpfan's threads, I do not respond to a lot of them. Also, terp's articles are directed at the left in general, not at a specific individual, and DEFINITELY not by mislabelling that individual.

Congratulations, Ben. You got exactly what you were looking for. A response. But you've also compromised every possibility of my ever taking you seriously.

Here are a few more. Feel free to use any of these...

"Voice of the sheep"
"We don't need no stinkin' critical thinking."
"Working hard to earn your vote (from my basement apartment in my parent's house)
"I'm not a neocon, I'm an idiot libertarian."
"Pretending to be open minded while blacklisting dissenters"
"And you thought bull s**t came from cows"
"Sharp as a marble"

BenUser, it appears that you are starting a trend with your forum posts.  Please be aware that using forum posts to harass another blogger is against our TOU.  You are making it quite clear who this is directed at, so don't pretend that it is just coincidence.  Please refrain from using the forums as a way to harass other bloggers.

Ben,

Consider yourself OFF my list of acceptable reading. Nice job.